A few recent highlights:

-Lisa at FMH writes a Feminist Polygamy Manifesto — don’t miss it.
-Aaron at BoH: Faker or fakir?
-Bloggernackers (heart) Elise Soukup: DMI, Mormon Stories, and a nice interview at M*.
Chloroform in print on iPod.
-DMI wants to start a discussion group about whether discussion groups are permitted. Clearly he has forgotten “the first rule of discussion groups is you do not talk about discussion groups . . .”
-Reminder: Volunteers sought to participate in polygamy . . . survey.
-Finally, if you like your navel-gazing with a healthy dose of snark, you may want to look at a relative bloggernacle newcomer, doubtless administered by famed ‘nacle urban-legend-buster arJ.

9 comments for “Bloggernacking

  1. October 21, 2005 at 11:49 am

    Nice job, Kaimi. It’s great to see the return of this feature.

  2. a random John
    October 21, 2005 at 12:58 pm

    SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! The first rule of the Snarkernacle is that you don’t talk about the Snarkernacle!

    The second rule is that you don’t speculate as to the identity of the Snark. That said, I’m casting my vote for Aaron Cox.

  3. October 21, 2005 at 2:40 pm

    No, the SnarkerNackle is not aRJ. I’m pretty sure it’s someone who has a deep and abiding interest in LDSDoctrine.

  4. a random John
    October 21, 2005 at 2:58 pm


    Stop it! Plus, what are you saying about the depth of my interest in doctrine?

  5. October 21, 2005 at 2:58 pm

    Err, I meant LDSGospelDoctrine.

  6. October 21, 2005 at 3:00 pm

    First of all, John, you are much too nice to be the SnarkerNackle. You can’t fool me for a second. Secondly, I didn’t mean that the way it came out. I was trying to put a clue to the SnarkerNackle’s identity in there.

  7. Steve Evans
    October 21, 2005 at 3:37 pm

    Old Neddy’s right on this one.

  8. October 21, 2005 at 4:48 pm

    Indeed. Of course the ease with which we can tell the identity of person behind the Snarkernacle highlights the skill of the people behind Banner of Heaven.

    (I have lots of guesses who is behind that fake blog, but it is hard to tell for sure. I am starting to think it is written by a few ‘nacle regulars and a few friends that are not regulars — or at least not blog owners or heavy commenters… It is too hard to maintain a real identity and a fictional one at the same time for most people.)

  9. October 24, 2005 at 10:12 am


    Youre as right as ever, which is to say, “not at all”. I might be an extreme dorito, but you can thank yourself and the other Steve for that one.


    Thanks for the plug, but just because I’m curt Kurt the snarky snarker that doesnt make me the Bloggernacle Snarker.

Comments are closed.